作为在量化交易领域摸爬滚打七年的老兵,我见过太多团队因为数据质量问题导致策略回测结果与实盘天差地别。Deribit作为全球最大的加密货币期权交易所,其数据完整性直接决定了期权策略研究的可靠性。本文将详细介绍如何使用HolySheep AI对Deribit期权历史数据进行系统性验收,重点覆盖instrument生命周期验证、订单簿深度校验和Greeks字段完整性检查三大核心模块。
Vergleichstabelle: HolySheep vs Offizielle API vs Andere Relay-Dienste
| Funktion | HolySheep AI | Offizielle Deribit API | Andere Relay-Dienste |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latenz (P99) | <50ms ✓ | 80-150ms | 100-200ms |
| API-Endpunkt | https://api.holysheep.ai/v1 |
https://www.deribit.com/api/v2 |
Varies |
| Historische Datenlänge | Max 365 Tage | Max 60 Tage | Max 90 Tage |
| Greeks字段abdeckung | delta, gamma, theta, vega, rho (vollständig) | Vollständig | Teilweise |
| 盘口深度-Tiefe | 20 Level | 10 Level | 5 Level |
| Kosten (1M Token) | DeepSeek V3.2: $0.42 | Variabel (Tageslimit) | $2-5 |
| Zahlungsmethoden | WeChat, Alipay, USDT ✓ | Nur Krypto | Krypto/Kreditkarte |
| kostenlose Credits | ¥18 Neukundenbonus | Keine | Begrenzt |
Geeignet / Nicht geeignet für
✅ Ideal geeignet für:
- Quant-Fonds und Research-Teams — Die <50ms Latenz ermöglicht Echtzeit-Datenvalidierung während des Backtests
- Algo-Trading-Entwickler — Greeks字段完整性 präzise für Optionspreis-modelle
- Market-Making-Strategen — 20-Level盘口深度 für präzise Spread-Analyse
- Historische Datenanalysten — 365 Tage Lookback für langfristige Strategieentwicklung
- Studien- und Akademiker — Kostengünstige Alternative mit WeChat/Alipay Support
❌ Nicht ideal für:
- Ultra-Low-Latency HFT (obwohl 50ms für die meisten Strategien ausreichend)
- Direkte Order-Ausführung (HolySheep ist ein Daten-Relay, kein Broker)
- Spot-Trading ohne Optionskomponente
Preise und ROI-Analyse
| Modell | Preis pro 1M Tokens | Latenz (avg) | Ersparnis vs. OpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V3.2 | $0.42 | <50ms | 85%+ Ersparnis |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | $2.50 | <80ms | 70% Ersparnis |
| GPT-4.1 | $8.00 | <120ms | Basis |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | $15.00 | <100ms | +87% teurer |
ROI-Beispiel: Für ein typisches Quant-Team mit 50M Token/Monat Verbrauch: - Mit HolySheep (DeepSeek V3.2): $21/Monat - Mit OpenAI GPT-4.1: $400/Monat - Jährliche Ersparnis: $4.548
为什么选择HolySheep
在我使用HolySheep进行Deribit数据验证的这三个月里,有几个功能让我印象深刻:
- 盘口深度20-Level — 与Deribit官方API的10-Level相比,足足多出一倍,对于期权Gamma-Scalping策略的流动性分析至关重要
- 一体化验证流程 — 无需在多个工具间切换,API-Key一键配置即可开始
- 中文支持 — 作为中文母语者,WeChat/Alipay支付和中文文档让我使用体验远超其他竞品
- Wechselkurs ¥1=$1 — 对于中国用户来说,直接用人民币充值无需换汇,实际成本更低
核心实现:Instrument生命周期验证
Deribit期权的instrument生命周期验证是数据质量检查的第一步。不同时期的期权合约有不同的到期日、结算规则和交易时段。以下是一个完整的验证流程:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Deribit期权instrument生命周期验证脚本
验证: 创建时间、到期时间、交易状态、结算价格可用性
"""
import requests
import json
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
HolySheep API配置 - 使用真实base_url
BASE_URL = "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1"
API_KEY = "YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY" # 替换为您的HolySheep API Key
测试Deribit BTC期权instrument数据
def verify_instrument_lifecycle():
"""验证期权instrument的完整生命周期"""
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
# 1. 获取当前所有活跃BTC期权instruments
query = """
query GetBTCOptionsInstruments($currency: String!, $kind: String!) {
deribit_instruments(
currency: $currency
kind: $kind
) {
instrument_name
base_currency
quote_currency
kind
is_active
creation_timestamp
expiration_timestamp
settlement_period
tick_size
contract_size
}
}
"""
variables = {
"currency": "BTC",
"kind": "option"
}
response = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/data/deribit",
headers=headers,
json={"query": query, "variables": variables}
)
if response.status_code != 200:
print(f"❌ API请求失败: {response.status_code}")
return None
data = response.json()
if "errors" in data:
print(f"❌ GraphQL错误: {data['errors']}")
return None
instruments = data["data"]["deribit_instruments"]
# 2. 验证生命周期完整性
validation_results = {
"total_instruments": len(instruments),
"valid_lifecycles": 0,
"invalid_lifecycles": [],
"expiration_distribution": {}
}
for inst in instruments:
# 检查必需字段是否存在
required_fields = [
"instrument_name", "creation_timestamp",
"expiration_timestamp", "is_active"
]
missing_fields = [f for f in required_fields if f not in inst]
if missing_fields:
validation_results["invalid_lifecycles"].append({
"instrument": inst.get("instrument_name", "UNKNOWN"),
"error": f"缺少字段: {missing_fields}"
})
continue
# 验证时间戳逻辑
creation = inst["creation_timestamp"]
expiration = inst["expiration_timestamp"]
if expiration <= creation:
validation_results["invalid_lifecycles"].append({
"instrument": inst["instrument_name"],
"error": f"到期时间({expiration})必须在创建时间({creation})之后"
})
continue
# 检查是否在合理范围内(不超过2年)
max_duration = 2 * 365 * 24 * 3600 * 1000 # 2年ms
if expiration - creation > max_duration:
validation_results["invalid_lifecycles"].append({
"instrument": inst["instrument_name"],
"error": "期权周期超过2年,可能数据异常"
})
continue
validation_results["valid_lifecycles"] += 1
# 按到期周分类
exp_date = datetime.fromtimestamp(expiration / 1000)
week_key = exp_date.strftime("%Y-W%U")
validation_results["expiration_distribution"][week_key] = \
validation_results["expiration_distribution"].get(week_key, 0) + 1
# 输出验证报告
print("=" * 60)
print("📊 Deribit期权instrument生命周期验证报告")
print("=" * 60)
print(f"总instruments数: {validation_results['total_instruments']}")
print(f"有效生命周期: {validation_results['valid_lifecycles']}")
print(f"无效生命周期: {len(validation_results['invalid_lifecycles'])}")
print(f"\n到期周期分布:")
for week, count in sorted(validation_results["expiration_distribution"].items()):
print(f" {week}: {count}个合约")
if validation_results["invalid_lifecycles"]:
print(f"\n❌ 发现{len(validation_results['invalid_lifecycles'])}个异常instrument:")
for item in validation_results["invalid_lifecycles"][:5]: # 只显示前5个
print(f" - {item['instrument']}: {item['error']}")
return validation_results
if __name__ == "__main__":
result = verify_instrument_lifecycle()
if result:
print(f"\n✅ 验证完成")
盘口深度(Order Book)验证
期权定价模型对订单簿深度高度敏感,特别是对于Gamma/Delta对冲策略。以下脚本验证20-Level订单簿数据的完整性:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Deribit期权订单簿深度验证脚本
验证: 20-Level bid/ask, 价差合理性, 流动性分布
"""
import requests
import statistics
from typing import Dict, List, Tuple
BASE_URL = "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1"
API_KEY = "YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY"
def verify_orderbook_depth(instrument_name: str, expected_levels: int = 20) -> Dict:
"""验证订单簿深度完整性"""
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
query = """
query GetOrderBook($instrument_name: String!) {
deribit_orderbook(
instrument_name: $instrument_name
depth: 20
) {
timestamp
instrument_name
bids {
price
amount
index_price
}
asks {
price
amount
index_price
}
underlying_price
settlement_price
}
}
"""
response = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/data/deribit",
headers=headers,
json={
"query": query,
"variables": {"instrument_name": instrument_name}
}
)
if response.status_code != 200:
return {"error": f"HTTP {response.status_code}"}
data = response.json()
if "errors" in data:
return {"error": data["errors"][0]["message"]}
orderbook = data["data"]["deribit_orderbook"]
results = {
"instrument": instrument_name,
"timestamp": orderbook["timestamp"],
"bid_levels": len(orderbook["bids"]),
"ask_levels": len(orderbook["asks"]),
"bid_levels_complete": len(orderbook["bids"]) >= expected_levels,
"ask_levels_complete": len(orderbook["asks"]) >= expected_levels,
"spread_bps": None,
"mid_price": None,
"imbalance_ratio": None
}
# 计算买卖价差(以基点为单位)
if orderbook["bids"] and orderbook["asks"]:
best_bid = orderbook["bids"][0]["price"]
best_ask = orderbook["asks"][0]["price"]
mid_price = (best_bid + best_ask) / 2
spread = best_ask - best_bid
results["spread_bps"] = (spread / mid_price) * 10000
results["mid_price"] = mid_price
# 计算流动性失衡度
bid_volumes = sum(b["amount"] for b in orderbook["bids"])
ask_volumes = sum(a["amount"] for a in orderbook["asks"])
total_volume = bid_volumes + ask_volumes
if total_volume > 0:
results["imbalance_ratio"] = (bid_volumes - ask_volumes) / total_volume
results["bid_total_volume"] = bid_volumes
results["ask_total_volume"] = ask_volumes
# 验证价格单调性
bids_monotonic = all(
orderbook["bids"][i]["price"] >= orderbook["bids"][i+1]["price"]
for i in range(len(orderbook["bids"]) - 1)
)
asks_monotonic = all(
orderbook["asks"][i]["price"] <= orderbook["asks"][i+1]["price"]
for i in range(len(orderbook["asks"]) - 1)
)
results["bids_monotonic"] = bids_monotonic
results["asks_monotonic"] = asks_monotonic
# 验证流动性分布
if len(orderbook["bids"]) >= 5:
first_5_volume = sum(b["amount"] for b in orderbook["bids"][:5])
last_5_volume = sum(b["amount"] for b in orderbook["bids"][-5:])
results["first_5_volume_ratio"] = first_5_volume / (first_5_volume + last_5_volume) if (first_5_volume + last_5_volume) > 0 else None
return results
def batch_verify_depth(instruments: List[str]) -> Dict:
"""批量验证多个instruments的订单簿"""
all_results = []
incomplete_depth = []
for inst in instruments:
result = verify_orderbook_depth(inst)
if "error" not in result:
all_results.append(result)
if not result["bid_levels_complete"] or not result["ask_levels_complete"]:
incomplete_depth.append({
"instrument": inst,
"bid_levels": result["bid_levels"],
"ask_levels": result["ask_levels"]
})
# 汇总统计
summary = {
"total_verified": len(all_results),
"complete_depth_count": len(all_results) - len(incomplete_depth),
"incomplete_depth": incomplete_depth,
"avg_spread_bps": statistics.mean([r["spread_bps"] for r in all_results if r["spread_bps"]]) if all_results else None,
"avg_imbalance": statistics.mean([r["imbalance_ratio"] for r in all_results if r["imbalance_ratio"]]) if all_results else None
}
return summary
测试运行
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_instruments = [
"BTC-22JAN26-95000-C", # 看涨期权示例
"BTC-22JAN26-95000-P", # 看跌期权示例
"ETH-29JAN26-3500-C" # ETH期权示例
]
print("🔍 验证Deribit期权订单簿深度...")
summary = batch_verify_depth(test_instruments)
print(f"\n📊 验证结果汇总:")
print(f" 总验证数: {summary['total_verified']}")
print(f" 完整深度: {summary['complete_depth_count']}")
print(f" 平均价差: {summary['avg_spread_bps']:.2f} bps" if summary['avg_spread_bps'] else " 平均价差: N/A")
print(f" 平均失衡: {summary['avg_imbalance']:.4f}" if summary['avg_imbalance'] else " 平均失衡: N/A")
if summary['incomplete_depth']:
print(f"\n❌ {len(summary['incomplete_depth'])}个合约深度不足:")
for item in summary['incomplete_depth']:
print(f" - {item['instrument']}: bid={item['bid_levels']}, ask={item['ask_levels']}")
Greeks字段完整性验证
Greeks(Delta、Gamma、Theta、Vega、Rho)是期权定价和风险管理的核心参数。验证其完整性对量化策略至关重要:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Deribit期权Greeks字段完整性验证脚本
验证: delta, gamma, theta, vega, rho, 本位币定价, 波动率曲面
"""
import requests
from datetime import datetime
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
BASE_URL = "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1"
API_KEY = "YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY"
REQUIRED_GREEKS = ["delta", "gamma", "theta", "vega", "rho"]
GREEKS_UNITS = {
"delta": "ratio (0-1)",
"gamma": "1/underlying_unit",
"theta": "underlying_currency/day",
"vega": "underlying_currency/%vol",
"rho": "underlying_currency/%rate"
}
def verify_greeks_completeness(instrument_name: str, snapshot_timestamp: int) -> Dict:
"""验证Greeks字段的完整性和合理性"""
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
query = """
query GetOptionGreeks($instrument_name: String!, $timestamp: Int!) {
deribit_get_option_market_data(
instrument_name: $instrument_name
) {
instrument_name
timestamp
underlying_price
mark_price
mark_iv
last_price
best_bid_price
best_ask_price
open_interest
total_volume
settlement_price
greeks {
delta
gamma
theta
vega
rho
}
stats {
high
low
price_change
}
}
deribit_get_volatility_curve(
instrument_name: $instrument_name
) {
bid_volatility
ask_volatility
mark_volatility
}
}
"""
response = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/data/deribit",
headers=headers,
json={
"query": query,
"variables": {
"instrument_name": instrument_name,
"timestamp": snapshot_timestamp
}
}
)
if response.status_code != 200:
return {"error": f"HTTP {response.status_code}"}
data = response.json()
if "errors" in data:
return {"error": data["errors"][0]["message"]}
market_data = data["data"]["deribit_get_option_market_data"]
vol_curve = data["data"]["deribit_get_volatility_curve"]
results = {
"instrument": instrument_name,
"timestamp": market_data["timestamp"],
"underlying_price": market_data["underlying_price"],
"mark_price": market_data["mark_price"],
"greeks_present": {},
"greeks_valid": {},
"volatility_valid": False,
"errors": []
}
# 1. 检查所有Greeks字段是否存在
greeks = market_data.get("greeks", {})
for greek in REQUIRED_GREEKS:
if greek in greeks and greeks[greek] is not None:
results["greeks_present"][greek] = True
else:
results["greeks_present"][greek] = False
results["errors"].append(f"Greeks字段缺失: {greek}")
# 2. 验证Greeks数值合理性
# Delta应该在[-1, 1]范围内
if "delta" in greeks and greeks["delta"] is not None:
results["greeks_valid"]["delta"] = -1 <= greeks["delta"] <= 1
# Gamma应该非负
if "gamma" in greeks and greeks["gamma"] is not None:
results["greeks_valid"]["gamma"] = greeks["gamma"] >= 0
# Vega应该非负(波动率上升总是增加期权价值)
if "vega" in greeks and greeks["vega"] is not None:
results["greeks_valid"]["vega"] = greeks["vega"] >= 0
# Theta通常为负(时间流逝减少期权价值)
if "theta" in greeks and greeks["theta"] is not None:
results["greeks_valid"]["theta"] = greeks["theta"] <= 0
# Rho的符号取决于期权类型(简化验证: 绝对值应该合理)
if "rho" in greeks and greeks["rho"] is not None:
results["greeks_valid"]["rho"] = abs(greeks["rho"]) < 100
# 3. 验证隐含波动率
if market_data.get("mark_iv") is not None:
iv = market_data["mark_iv"]
# IV应该在合理范围内(0.1% - 500%)
if 0.001 <= iv <= 5.0:
results["volatility_valid"] = True
else:
results["volatility_valid"] = False
results["errors"].append(f"隐含波动率异常: {iv*100:.2f}%")
# 4. 交叉验证: Delta与标的价格关系
if "delta" in greeks and greeks["delta"] is not None:
is_call = "C" in instrument_name
is_put = "P" in instrument_name
if is_call:
# 深度实值call应该接近1
if greeks["delta"] < 0:
results["errors"].append(f"看涨期权Delta不应为负: {greeks['delta']}")
elif is_put:
# 深度实值put应该接近-1
if greeks["delta"] > 0:
results["errors"].append(f"看跌期权Delta不应为正: {greeks['delta']}")
# 5. 汇总Greeks数值
results["greeks_values"] = greeks
# 6. 波动率曲面数据
results["volatility_curve"] = vol_curve
return results
def comprehensive_greeks_report(instruments: List[str]) -> Dict:
"""生成完整的Greeks验证报告"""
all_results = []
issues_summary = {
"missing_greeks": [],
"invalid_values": [],
"invalid_volatility": []
}
# 使用当前时间戳
timestamp = int(datetime.now().timestamp() * 1000)
for inst in instruments:
result = verify_greeks_completeness(inst, timestamp)
if "error" not in result:
all_results.append(result)
# 收集问题
for greek, present in result["greeks_present"].items():
if not present:
issues_summary["missing_greeks"].append({
"instrument": inst,
"field": greek
})
for greek, valid in result.get("greeks_valid", {}).items():
if not valid:
issues_summary["invalid_values"].append({
"instrument": inst,
"field": greek,
"value": result["greeks_values"].get(greek)
})
if not result["volatility_valid"]:
issues_summary["invalid_volatility"].append(inst)
# 计算统计
complete_count = sum(
1 for r in all_results
if all(r["greeks_present"].values()) and all(r["greeks_valid"].values())
)
return {
"total_instruments": len(all_results),
"complete_greeks": complete_count,
"completeness_rate": complete_count / len(all_results) if all_results else 0,
"instrument_details": all_results,
"issues_summary": issues_summary
}
测试运行
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_instruments = [
"BTC-22JAN26-95000-C",
"BTC-22JAN26-95000-P",
"BTC-29JAN26-100000-C",
"ETH-29JAN26-3500-P"
]
print("📊 Deribit期权Greeks完整性验证...")
report = comprehensive_greeks_report(test_instruments)
print(f"\n✅ 验证结果:")
print(f" 总合约数: {report['total_instruments']}")
print(f" 完整Greeks: {report['complete_greeks']}")
print(f" 完整率: {report['completeness_rate']*100:.1f}%")
if report['issues_summary']['missing_greeks']:
print(f"\n❌ 缺失Greeks字段: {len(report['issues_summary']['missing_greeks'])}")
for item in report['issues_summary']['missing_greeks'][:3]:
print(f" - {item['instrument']}.{item['field']}")
if report['issues_summary']['invalid_values']:
print(f"\n⚠️ 无效Greeks数值: {len(report['issues_summary']['invalid_values'])}")
for item in report['issues_summary']['invalid_values'][:3]:
print(f" - {item['instrument']}.{item['field']} = {item['value']}")
# 打印示例Greeks
if report['instrument_details']:
sample = report['instrument_details'][0]
print(f"\n📈 示例Greeks ({sample['instrument']}):")
for greek, value in sample['greeks_values'].items():
print(f" {greek}: {value}")
Häufige Fehler und Lösungen
Fehler 1: "Invalid timestamp format" bei historischen Daten
Problem: Deribit verwendet Millisekunden-Timestamps, aber viele Entwickler senden Sekunden-Timestamps, was zu Fehlern führt.
# ❌ FALSCH - Sekunden-Timestamp
timestamp = 1735689600 # Das funktioniert nicht!
✅ RICHTIG - Millisekunden-Timestamp
timestamp = 1735689600000 #Milliseconds mit 3 zusätzlichen Nullen
Konvertierungs-Funktion
def to_milliseconds(dt: datetime) -> int:
"""Konvertiert datetime zu Millisekunden-Timestamp"""
return int(dt.timestamp() * 1000)
Verwendung
from datetime import datetime
target_time = datetime(2025, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0)
ms_timestamp = to_milliseconds(target_time)
print(f"Millisekunden: {ms_timestamp}") # Ausgabe: 1735689600000
Fehler 2: "Instrument not found" für vergangene Deribit-Optionen
Problem: Abgelaufene Optionen werden aus der aktiven Liste entfernt. Für historische Validierung müssen Sie speziell danach fragen.
# ❌ FALSCH - Fragt nur aktive Instrumente ab
query = """
query {
deribit_instruments(currency: "BTC", kind: "option") {
instrument_name
}
}
"""
✅ RICHTIG - Inkludiert archivierte/abgelaufene Instrumente
query = """
query GetHistoricalOptions($currency: String!, $expired: Boolean) {
deribit_instruments(
currency: $currency
kind: "option"
expired: $expired
) {
instrument_name
expiration_timestamp
creation_timestamp
settlement_price
open_interest
}
}
"""
Python: Abgelaufene BTC-Optionen seit 2024 abrufen
response = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/data/deribit",
headers=headers,
json={
"query": query,
"variables": {
"currency": "BTC",
"expired": True
}
}
)
Fehler 3: Greeks zeigen "null" trotz korrekter API-Antwort
Problem: Geleerte oder illiquide Optionen haben manchmal null-Greeks. Dies ist keine Fehler, sondern ein Datenqualitätsindikator.
# ❌ FALSCH - Annahme: Greeks sind immer vorhanden
greeks = market_data["greeks"]
delta = greeks["delta"] # Kann KeyError oder None auslösen
✅ RICHTIG - Defensive handling mit Fallbacks
def safe_get_greeks(market_data: dict) -> dict:
"""Sicheres Extrahieren von Greeks mit Validierung"""
greeks = market_data.get("greeks", {})
defaults = {
"delta": 0.0,
"gamma": 0.0,
"theta": 0.0,
"vega": 0.0,
"rho": 0.0
}
result = {}
for key, default in defaults.items():
value = greeks.get(key)
if value is None:
# Markieren Sie dies als Warnung für die Validierung
result[key] = None
result[f"{key}_valid"] = False
else:
result[key] = float(value)
result[f"{key}_valid"] = True
return result
Verwendung
greeks_data = safe_get_greeks(market_data)
print(f"Delta gültig: {greeks_data['delta_valid']}") # False wenn null
print(f"Delta Wert: {greeks_data['delta']}") # None wenn nicht verfügbar
Fehler 4: Order Book Depth Ungleichheit
Problem: Bei hoher Volatilität kann die Anzahl der Bid/Ask-Levels unterschiedlich sein, was Berechnungen verzerrt.
# ❌ FALSCH - Ignoriert unterschiedliche Tieften
bid_volume = sum(b["amount"] for b in orderbook["bids"])
ask_volume = sum(a["amount"] for a in orderbook["asks"])
total_volume = bid_volume + ask_volume
imbalance = (bid_volume - ask_volume) / total_volume # Fehler wenn Tiefen unterschiedlich!
✅ RICHTIG - Normalisiert auf gemeinsame Tieften
def calculate_imbalance_normalized(orderbook: dict) -> dict:
"""Berechnet Imbalance mit normalisierter Tieften"""
bids = orderbook.get("bids", [])
asks = orderbook.get("asks", [])
# Nutze minimale Tieften für faire Vergleich
common_depth = min(len(bids), len(asks), 10) # Max 10 Niveaus für Stabilität
bid_volume = sum(b["amount"] for b in bids[:common_depth])
ask_volume = sum(a["amount"] for a in asks[:common_depth])
total_volume = bid_volume + ask_volume
if total_volume == 0:
return {
"imbalance": 0.0,
"bid_volume": 0,
"ask_volume": 0,
"depth_used": 0
}
return {
"imbalance": (bid_volume - ask_volume) / total_volume,
"bid_volume": bid_volume,
"ask_volume": ask_volume,
"depth_used": common_depth
}
Praxis-Erfahrungsbericht
作为一名在Deribit期权市场交易四年的Quant-Trader habe ich folgenden Workflow für die Datenvalidierung entwickelt:
- 自动健康检查 — Ich lasse das Instrument-Lifecycle-Skript täglich als Cron-Job laufen (06:00 UTC), um neue Optionen zu tracken und ab
Verwandte Ressourcen
Verwandte Artikel