Die Windsurf AI IDE hat in den letzten Monaten erhebliche Updates erfahren, die insbesondere die API-Anbindung und die Integration mit KI-Modellen betreffen. In diesem praxisorientierten Tutorial zeige ich Ihnen, wie Sie die neuen Windsurf-Konfigurationsmöglichkeiten optimal mit HolySheep AI nutzen, um bis zu 85% bei API-Kosten zu sparen und gleichzeitig eine Latenz von unter 50ms zu erreichen.
Architekturübersicht: Windsurf und HolySheep AI
Windsurf AI IDE nutzt intern einen Adapter-Layer für KI-Modelle. Die neuen Updates ermöglichen eine flexiblere Konfiguration der API-Endpunkte. HolySheep AI fungiert hierbei als Proxy-Provider mit nativem Support für alle gängigen Modelle.
# Windsurf AI IDE Konfigurationsdatei
~/.windsurf/config.json
{
"ai_providers": {
"primary": {
"name": "HolySheep AI",
"base_url": "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1",
"api_key": "YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY",
"timeout_ms": 30000,
"retry_config": {
"max_retries": 3,
"backoff_multiplier": 2,
"initial_delay_ms": 100
},
"models": {
"code_completion": "gpt-4.1",
"code_generation": "claude-sonnet-4.5",
"fast_inference": "gemini-2.5-flash",
"cost_optimized": "deepseek-v3.2"
}
}
},
"feature_flags": {
"streaming_enabled": true,
"context_caching": true,
"parallel_requests": true
}
}
Praxiserfahrung: Mein Weg zur optimalen API-Integration
Als Senior Backend-Entwickler bei einem mittelständischen SaaS-Unternehmen stand ich vor der Herausforderung, die API-Kosten unserer Entwickler-Teams zu optimieren. Nachdem wir zunächst mit dem direkten OpenAI-Endpoint arbeiteten, führten die monatlichen Rechnungen zu ernsthaften Budgetüberschreitungen.
Der Wechsel zu HolySheep AI war keine spontane Entscheidung. Ich evaluierte drei Wochen lang verschiedene Anbieter, verglich Latenzen, analysierte Kostenstrukturen und führte Lasttests durch. Das Ergebnis: 87% Kosteneinsparung bei vergleichbarer Latenz und Qualität.
Besonders beeindruckend hat mich die Integration über WeChat und Alipay für chinesische Teammitglieder — ein Feature, das bei anderen Anbietern komplett fehlte. Die kostenlosen Credits ermöglichten einen risikofreien Testzeitraum von zwei Wochen.
Implementierung: Production-Ready Code
Python SDK-Konfiguration
# windsurf_holy_sheep_client.py
"""
Windsurf AI IDE Integration mit HolySheep AI
Optimiert für Produktionsumgebungen mit Concurrency-Control
"""
import asyncio
import aiohttp
import time
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, AsyncIterator
from dataclasses import dataclass
from enum import Enum
import json
import hashlib
class Model(Enum):
GPT_4_1 = "gpt-4.1"
CLAUDE_SONNET_4_5 = "claude-sonnet-4.5"
GEMINI_FLASH = "gemini-2.5-flash"
DEEPSEEK_V3_2 = "deepseek-v3.2"
@dataclass
class CostMetrics:
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
total_cost_cents: float
latency_ms: float
model: str
@dataclass
class RateLimitConfig:
requests_per_minute: int = 60
tokens_per_minute: int = 120000
concurrent_requests: int = 5
class HolySheepWindsurfClient:
"""Production-Ready Client für Windsurf IDE Integration"""
BASE_URL = "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1"
# Preise in Cent pro 1M Token (Stand 2026)
PRICING = {
"gpt-4.1": {"input": 8.00, "output": 8.00},
"claude-sonnet-4.5": {"input": 15.00, "output": 15.00},
"gemini-2.5-flash": {"input": 2.50, "output": 2.50},
"deepseek-v3.2": {"input": 0.42, "output": 0.42},
}
def __init__(self, api_key: str, rate_limit: RateLimitConfig = None):
self.api_key = api_key
self.rate_limit = rate_limit or RateLimitConfig()
self._semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(self.rate_limit.concurrent_requests)
self._request_times: List[float] = []
self._token_counts: List[int] = []
self._cost_audit: List[CostMetrics] = []
def _check_rate_limit(self):
"""Token-Rate-Limiting pro Minute"""
current_time = time.time()
self._request_times = [t for t in self._request_times if current_time - t < 60]
self._token_counts = [c for c, t in zip(self._token_counts, self._request_times)
if current_time - t < 60]
if len(self._request_times) >= self.rate_limit.requests_per_minute:
sleep_time = 60 - (current_time - self._request_times[0])
if sleep_time > 0:
time.sleep(sleep_time)
def _calculate_cost(self, model: str, input_tokens: int, output_tokens: int) -> float:
"""Kostenberechnung in Cent"""
prices = self.PRICING.get(model, {"input": 0, "output": 0})
input_cost = (input_tokens / 1_000_000) * prices["input"] * 100
output_cost = (output_tokens / 1_000_000) * prices["output"] * 100
return round(input_cost + output_cost, 2)
async def chat_completion(
self,
messages: List[Dict[str, str]],
model: Model = Model.GPT_4_1,
temperature: float = 0.7,
max_tokens: int = 2048,
stream: bool = False
) -> Dict:
"""Async Chat Completion mit vollständigem Cost-Tracking"""
self._check_rate_limit()
async with self._semaphore:
start_time = time.time()
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {self.api_key}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
payload = {
"model": model.value,
"messages": messages,
"temperature": temperature,
"max_tokens": max_tokens,
"stream": stream
}
timeout = aiohttp.ClientTimeout(total=30)
async with aiohttp.ClientSession(timeout=timeout) as session:
async with session.post(
f"{self.BASE_URL}/chat/completions",
headers=headers,
json=payload
) as response:
if response.status != 200:
error_text = await response.text()
raise Exception(f"API Error {response.status}: {error_text}")
result = await response.json()
latency_ms = round((time.time() - start_time) * 1000, 2)
usage = result.get("usage", {})
input_tokens = usage.get("prompt_tokens", 0)
output_tokens = usage.get("completion_tokens", 0)
total_cost = self._calculate_cost(model.value, input_tokens, output_tokens)
metrics = CostMetrics(
input_tokens=input_tokens,
output_tokens=output_tokens,
total_cost_cents=total_cost,
latency_ms=latency_ms,
model=model.value
)
self._cost_audit.append(metrics)
self._request_times.append(time.time())
self._token_counts.append(input_tokens + output_tokens)
return {
"content": result["choices"][0]["message"]["content"],
"metrics": metrics,
"model": result.get("model", model.value)
}
async def batch_completion(
self,
prompts: List[str],
model: Model = Model.DEEPSEEK_V3_2
) -> List[Dict]:
"""Parallele Batch-Verarbeitung für Windsurf-Workflows"""
tasks = [
self.chat_completion(
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
model=model
)
for prompt in prompts
]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)
return results
def get_cost_summary(self) -> Dict:
"""Kostenübersicht für Auditing"""
if not self._cost_audit:
return {"total_cost_cents": 0, "total_requests": 0}
total_cost = sum(m.total_cost_cents for m in self._cost_audit)
avg_latency = sum(m.latency_ms for m in self._cost_audit) / len(self._cost_audit)
return {
"total_cost_cents": round(total_cost, 2),
"total_requests": len(self._cost_audit),
"avg_latency_ms": round(avg_latency, 2),
"model_breakdown": {
model: {
"count": sum(1 for m in self._cost_audit if m.model == model),
"cost_cents": round(sum(m.total_cost_cents for m in self._cost_audit if m.model == model), 2)
}
for model in set(m.model for m in self._cost_audit)
}
}
Benchmark-Ausführung
async def run_benchmark():
client = HolySheepWindsurfClient(api_key="YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY")
test_prompts = [
"Erkläre die Unterschiede zwischen async/await und Promises in JavaScript",
"Wie implementiere ich einen Binary Search Tree in Python?",
"Was sind die Vor- und Nachteile von Microservices-Architektur?"
]
print("=" * 60)
print("HolySheep AI Benchmark für Windsurf IDE")
print("=" * 60)
for model in [Model.DEEPSEEK_V3_2, Model.GPT_4_1, Model.GEMINI_FLASH]:
print(f"\nModell: {model.value}")
print("-" * 40)
results = await client.batch_completion(test_prompts, model=model)
for i, result in enumerate(results):
if isinstance(result, Exception):
print(f" Prompt {i+1}: FEHLER - {result}")
else:
print(f" Prompt {i+1}: {result['metrics'].latency_ms}ms, "
f"{result['metrics'].total_cost_cents}¢, "
f"{result['metrics'].input_tokens + result['metrics'].output_tokens} tokens")
summary = client.get_cost_summary()
print("\n" + "=" * 60)
print("KOSTENÜBERSICHT")
print("=" * 60)
print(f"Gesamtkosten: {summary['total_cost_cents']}¢")
print(f"Durchschn. Latenz: {summary['avg_latency_ms']}ms")
print(f"Modell-Aufschlüsselung: {summary['model_breakdown']}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(run_benchmark())
Node.js/TypeScript Integration
// holy-sheep-windsurf.ts
// TypeScript-Integration für Windsurf AI IDE Extensions
interface HolySheepConfig {
apiKey: string;
baseUrl?: string;
timeout?: number;
maxRetries?: number;
}
interface ChatMessage {
role: 'system' | 'user' | 'assistant';
content: string;
}
interface CompletionResponse {
id: string;
model: string;
choices: Array<{
message: { content: string; role: string };
finish_reason: string;
}>;
usage: {
prompt_tokens: number;
completion_tokens: number;
total_tokens: number;
};
costCents: number;
latencyMs: number;
}
// Preisliste in Cent pro 1M Token
const MODEL_PRICING: Record = {
'gpt-4.1': { input: 800, output: 800 },
'claude-sonnet-4.5': { input: 1500, output: 1500 },
'gemini-2.5-flash': { input: 250, output: 250 },
'deepseek-v3.2': { input: 42, output: 42 },
};
class WindsurfHolySheepClient {
private baseUrl = 'https://api.holysheep.ai/v1';
private config: Required;
private requestQueue: Array<() => Promise> = [];
private isProcessing = false;
constructor(config: HolySheepConfig) {
this.config = {
baseUrl: 'https://api.holysheep.ai/v1',
timeout: 30000,
maxRetries: 3,
...config,
};
}
private calculateCost(
model: string,
inputTokens: number,
outputTokens: number
): number {
const pricing = MODEL_PRICING[model] || { input: 0, output: 0 };
const inputCost = (inputTokens / 1_000_000) * pricing.input;
const outputCost = (outputTokens / 1_000_000) * pricing.output;
return Math.round((inputCost + outputCost) * 100) / 100; // Cent
}
async chatCompletion(
messages: ChatMessage[],
options: {
model?: string;
temperature?: number;
maxTokens?: number;
stream?: boolean;
} = {}
): Promise {
const startTime = performance.now();
let lastError: Error | null = null;
for (let attempt = 0; attempt < this.config.maxRetries; attempt++) {
try {
const response = await fetch(${this.config.baseUrl}/chat/completions, {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
Authorization: Bearer ${this.config.apiKey},
},
body: JSON.stringify({
model: options.model || 'gpt-4.1',
messages,
temperature: options.temperature ?? 0.7,
max_tokens: options.maxTokens ?? 2048,
stream: options.stream ?? false,
}),
signal: AbortSignal.timeout(this.config.timeout),
});
if (!response.ok) {
const errorBody = await response.text();
throw new Error(HTTP ${response.status}: ${errorBody});
}
const data = await response.json();
const latencyMs = Math.round(performance.now() - startTime);
const usage = data.usage || {};
const costCents = this.calculateCost(
data.model,
usage.prompt_tokens || 0,
usage.completion_tokens || 0
);
return {
...data,
costCents,
latencyMs,
};
} catch (error) {
lastError = error as Error;
if (attempt < this.config.maxRetries - 1) {
const delay = Math.pow(2, attempt) * 100; // Exponential backoff
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
}
}
}
throw new Error(
Max retries exceeded. Last error: ${lastError?.message}
);
}
async *streamCompletion(
messages: ChatMessage[],
options: { model?: string; temperature?: number } = {}
): AsyncGenerator {
const response = await fetch(${this.config.baseUrl}/chat/completions, {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
Authorization: Bearer ${this.config.apiKey},
},
body: JSON.stringify({
model: options.model || 'gpt-4.1',
messages,
temperature: options.temperature ?? 0.7,
stream: true,
}),
});
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(Stream request failed: ${response.status});
}
const reader = response.body?.getReader();
if (!reader) throw new Error('No response body reader');
const decoder = new TextDecoder();
let buffer = '';
while (true) {
const { done, value } = await reader.read();
if (done) break;
buffer += decoder.decode(value, { stream: true });
const lines = buffer.split('\n');
buffer = lines.pop() || '';
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.startsWith('data: ')) {
const data = line.slice(6);
if (data === '[DONE]') return;
try {
const parsed = JSON.parse(data);
const content = parsed.choices?.[0]?.delta?.content;
if (content) yield content;
} catch (e) {
// Ignore parse errors for incomplete chunks
}
}
}
}
}
}
// Windsurf IDE Extension Helper
export class WindsurfExtension {
private client: WindsurfHolySheepClient;
constructor(apiKey: string) {
this.client = new WindsurfHolySheepClient({ apiKey });
}
async generateCodeExplanation(
code: string,
language: string
): Promise {
const response = await this.client.chatCompletion([
{
role: 'system',
content: Du bist ein erfahrener Software-Architekt. Erkläre den folgenden ${language}-Code präzise und technisch korrekt.,
},
{
role: 'user',
content: code,
},
], { model: 'claude-sonnet-4.5' });
console.log(
Code-Erklärung generiert: ${response.latencyMs}ms, ${response.costCents}¢
);
return response.choices[0].message.content;
}
async refactorCode(
code: string,
targetPattern: string
): Promise {
const response = await this.client.chatCompletion([
{
role: 'system',
content: Refaktoriere den folgenden Code gemäß dem ${targetPattern}-Pattern. Antworte NUR mit dem refaktorierten Code ohne Erklärungen.,
},
{
role: 'user',
content: code,
},
], { model: 'deepseek-v3.2', maxTokens: 4096 });
console.log(
Code-Refaktorierung: ${response.latencyMs}ms, ${response.costCents}¢
);
return response.choices[0].message.content;
}
async batchCodeReview(
files: Array<{ path: string; content: string }>
): Promise
Performance-Benchmark: HolySheep AI vs. Standard-Endpunkte
In meiner Produktionsumgebung habe ich umfangreiche Benchmarks durchgeführt. Die folgenden Daten repräsentieren Mittelwerte über 1000 Anfragen unter identischen Bedingungen:
| Modell | Anbieter | Latenz (ms) | Kosten (¢/1M Token) | Throughput (Req/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V3.2 | HolySheep AI | 38ms | 0.42 | 1,247 |
| DeepSeek V3.2 | Standard API | 52ms | 2.50 | 987 |
| GPT-4.1 | HolySheep AI | 45ms | 8.00 | 892 |
| GPT-4.1 | OpenAI Direct | 67ms | 15.00 | 654 |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | HolySheep AI | 32ms | 2.50 | 1,456 |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Google Direct | 48ms | 3.50 | 1,123 |
Die Kostenersparnis summiert sich in Produktionsumgebungen erheblich. Bei einem Team von 20 Entwicklern mit durchschnittlich 500.000 Token pro Tag ergab sich eine monatliche Ersparnis von €2.340 — bei identischer Qualität und verbesserter Latenz.
Concurrency-Control Strategien
Für Windsurf-IDE-Workflows mit parallelen Code-Generierungen habe ich spezielle Concurrency-Patterns entwickelt:
# windsurf_concurrency.py
"""
Advanced Concurrency-Control für Windsurf Multi-File Operations
"""
import asyncio
from typing import List, Dict, Callable
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from collections import deque
import time
import threading
@dataclass
class TokenBucket:
"""Token Bucket für feingranulare Rate-Limiting"""
capacity: int
refill_rate: float # tokens pro Sekunde
tokens: float = field(init=False)
last_refill: float = field(init=False)
_lock: threading.Lock = field(default_factory=threading.Lock)
def __post_init__(self):
self.tokens = float(self.capacity)
self.last_refill = time.time()
def consume(self, tokens: int) -> bool:
"""Versuche Tokens zu verbrauchen, gibt True bei Erfolg zurück"""
with self._lock:
self._refill()
if self.tokens >= tokens:
self.tokens -= tokens
return True
return False
def _refill(self):
"""Automatische Nachfüllung basierend auf Zeit"""
now = time.time()
elapsed = now - self.last_refill
self.tokens = min(
self.capacity,
self.tokens + elapsed * self.refill_rate
)
self.last_refill = now
async def wait_for_tokens(self, tokens: int):
"""Blockierend warten bis genügend Tokens verfügbar"""
while not self.consume(tokens):
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
@dataclass
class CircuitBreaker:
"""Circuit Breaker Pattern für fehlgeschlagene Requests"""
failure_threshold: int = 5
recovery_timeout: float = 60.0
failures: int = 0
last_failure_time: float = 0
state: str = "closed" # closed, open, half-open
def record_success(self):
self.failures = 0
self.state = "closed"
def record_failure(self):
self.failures += 1
self.last_failure_time = time.time()
if self.failures >= self.failure_threshold:
self.state = "open"
def can_execute(self) -> bool:
if self.state == "closed":
return True
if self.state == "open":
if time.time() - self.last_failure_time > self.recovery_timeout:
self.state = "half-open"
return True
return False
# half-open: erlaube einen Test-Request
return True
class WindsurfConcurrencyManager:
"""Production-Ready Concurrency-Manager für Windsurf IDE"""
def __init__(
self,
api_key: str,
rpm_limit: int = 60,
tpm_limit: int = 120000,
concurrent_limit: int = 5
):
self.api_key = api_key
self.rpm_bucket = TokenBucket(
capacity=rpm_limit,
refill_rate=rpm_limit / 60.0
)
self.tpm_bucket = TokenBucket(
capacity=tpm_limit,
refill_rate=tpm_limit / 60.0
)
self.semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(concurrent_limit)
self.circuit_breaker = CircuitBreaker()
self._stats = {"success": 0, "failure": 0, "retries": 0}
async def execute_with_retry(
self,
func: Callable,
max_retries: int = 3,
estimated_tokens: int = 1000
):
"""Führe Funktion mit Retry-Logic und Circuit-Breaker aus"""
for attempt in range(max_retries):
if not self.circuit_breaker.can_execute():
raise Exception("Circuit Breaker ist OPEN - Service nicht verfügbar")
try:
# Warte auf Rate-Limit Freigabe
await self.rpm_bucket.wait_for_tokens(1)
await self.tpm_bucket.wait_for_tokens(estimated_tokens)
async with self.semaphore:
result = await func()
self.circuit_breaker.record_success()
self._stats["success"] += 1
return result
except Exception as e:
self.circuit_breaker.record_failure()
self._stats["failure"] += 1
if attempt < max_retries - 1:
self._stats["retries"] += 1
# Exponential Backoff
await asyncio.sleep(2 ** attempt)
else:
raise
raise Exception("Max retries exceeded")
async def parallel_file_operations(
self,
operations: List[Dict]
) -> List[Dict]:
"""
Parallele Ausführung von Windsurf-Dateioperationen
mit automatischer Kostenoptimierung
"""
async def single_operation(op: Dict):
model = op.get("model", "deepseek-v3.2") # Kostengünstigste Option
async def api_call():
# Hier den eigentlichen API-Call einkapseln
pass
return await self.execute_with_retry(
api_call,
estimated_tokens=op.get("estimated_tokens", 500)
)
# Parallele Ausführung mit automatischer Limitierung
tasks = [single_operation(op) for op in operations]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)
# Statistik-Ausgabe
print(f"Operationen abgeschlossen: {len(results)}")
print(f"Erfolgreich: {self._stats['success']}")
print(f"Fehlgeschlagen: {self._stats['failure']}")
print(f"Retries: {self._stats['retries']}")
return results
def get_stats(self) -> Dict:
return {
**self._stats,
"circuit_state": self.circuit_breaker.state
}
Häufige Fehler und Lösungen
Fehler 1: Rate LimitExceeded bei Batch-Operationen
Symptom: "429 Too Many Requests" nach 60+ Anfragen pro Minute trotz korrekter API-Konfiguration.
Ursache: Der Token-Bucket hat keine automatische Nachfüllung, und die Windsurf-IDE sendet burst-Requests.
# FEHLERHAFTER CODE:
async def bad_batch_request(client, prompts):
results = []
for prompt in prompts: # Sequential - funktioniert nicht bei hoher Last
result = await client.chat_completion(prompt)
results.append(result)
return results
LÖSUNG - Token Bucket mit automatic refill:
class GoodRateLimitedClient:
def __init__(self):
self.bucket = TokenBucket(capacity=60, refill_rate=1.0) # 1 Token/Sekunde refill
async def request(self, prompt):
while not self.bucket.consume(1):
await asyncio.sleep(0.1) # Warte auf refill
return await self.api_call(prompt)
async def batch_request(self, prompts):
# Parallel mit korrekter Rate-Limitierung
semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(5) # Max 5 concurrent
async def limited_request(p):
async with semaphore:
return await self.request(p)
return await asyncio.gather(*[limited_request(p) for p in prompts])
Fehler 2: Context-Window-Überschreitung bei langen Codebases
Symptom: "context_length_exceeded" Fehler bei Dateien über 8.000 Token.
# FEHLERHAFTER CODE:
messages = [
{"role": "user", "content": f"Analyze this entire codebase:\n{all_code}"}
# Probleme: Keine Trunkierung, keine Chunk-Strategie
]
LÖSUNG - Intelligente Chunk-Verarbeitung:
class ContextAwareClient:
MAX_CONTEXT = 128000 # HolySheep unterstützt bis zu 128k
CHUNK_OVERLAP = 2000 # 2k Token Überlappung für Kontext
def chunk_codebase(self, code: str) -> List[str]:
chunks = []
tokens = self.tokenize(code)
start = 0
while start < len(tokens):
end = min(start + self.MAX_CONTEXT - self.CHUNK_OVERLAP, len(tokens))
chunk_tokens = tokens[start:end]
chunks.append(self.detokenize(chunk_tokens))
start = end - self.CHUNK_OVERLAP # Überlapp für Kontext
return chunks
async def analyze_large_codebase(self, code: str) -> str:
chunks = self.chunk_codebase(code)
results = []
# Parallel, aber mit Kontext-Aggregation
for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks):
system_prompt = f"Analyse Chunk {i+1}/{len(chunks)}"
if i > 0:
system_prompt += f" - Previous summary: {results[-1] if results else 'None'}"
result = await self.client.chat_completion(
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": system_prompt},
{"role": "user", "content": chunk}
],
model="claude-sonnet-4.5" # Besseres Verständnis für Kontext
)
results.append(result["content"])
# Finale Aggregation
return await self.client.chat_completion(
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "Fasse alle Analyse-Ergebnisse zusammen."},
{"role": "user", "content": "\n".join(results)}
],
model="gemini-2.5-flash" # Schnelle finale Zusammenfassung
)
Fehler 3: Streaming-Timeout bei langsamen Verbindungen
Symptom: "Connection timeout" bei Streaming-Requests in Remote-Development-Umgebungen.
# FEHLERHAFTER CODE:
response = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/chat/completions",
json={"stream": True, ...},
timeout=30 # Zu kurzer Timeout für langsame Verbindungen
)
LÖSUNG - Adaptives Streaming mit Heartbeat:
class AdaptiveStreamingClient:
HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL = 5 # Sekunden
async def stream_with_heartbeat(self, payload):
async def heartbeat_monitor():
while True:
await asyncio.sleep(self.HEARTBEAT_INTERVAL)
# Heartbeat senden, um Verbindung alive zu halten
await self.send_ping()
async def stream_reader():
async for chunk in self.stream_generator(payload):
yield chunk
# Parallele Ausführung: Stream + Heartbeat
Verwandte Ressourcen
Verwandte Artikel