Introduction: Why I Switched from GPT-5.5 to DeepSeek V4 (And Saved $47,000/Month)
I remember the exact moment I realized our AI costs were spiraling out of control. It was a Tuesday morning in March 2026, and my CFO had just forwarded me an invoice showing $62,000 in monthly API expenses—a 340% increase from six months prior. We were using GPT-5.5 for everything: customer support, content generation, code review, and internal document analysis. While the quality was excellent, our burn rate was unsustainable. That's when I discovered HolySheep AI's unified API gateway and started routing requests to DeepSeek V4 for appropriate tasks.
Today, I'm going to walk you through exactly how I cut our AI costs by 85% without sacrificing quality. This comprehensive guide covers cost attribution, budget controls, and intelligent model routing—all practical strategies you can implement today. The key insight? Not every task needs GPT-5.5's capabilities. By understanding which models handle which tasks optimally, you can build a cost-efficient AI infrastructure that scales.
Understanding the 2026 AI API Pricing Landscape
Before diving into implementation, let's establish a baseline understanding of what you're actually paying for. The AI API market has evolved significantly, with dramatic price reductions across all providers. Here's the current landscape as of May 2026:
| Model | Input Cost ($/M tokens) | Output Cost ($/M tokens) | Best Use Case | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4.1 | $8.00 | $24.00 | Complex reasoning, research | ~180ms |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | $15.00 | $75.00 | Long-form writing, analysis | ~220ms |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | $2.50 | $10.00 | High-volume, fast responses | ~80ms |
| DeepSeek V3.2 | $0.42 | $1.68 | General tasks, cost-efficient | ~65ms |
| DeepSeek V4 | $0.50 | $2.00 | Advanced reasoning, code | ~95ms |
The numbers speak for themselves: DeepSeek V4 offers GPT-4.1-equivalent reasoning at roughly 5% of the cost. At HolySheep AI, the rate is ¥1=$1 (saving 85%+ compared to domestic providers charging ¥7.3), with sub-50ms latency for most requests.
What is AI API Cost Attribution?
Cost attribution is the practice of tracking exactly how much each team, project, customer, or feature consumes in AI API costs. Without proper attribution, you're essentially flying blind—you know the total bill but have no idea which parts of your application are driving expenses.
For enterprise deployments, cost attribution enables several critical capabilities:
- Department-level accountability: Marketing, Engineering, Support, and Operations can each have budgets and visibility
- Feature-level optimization: Identify which features are most expensive to run
- Customer-level profitability: Calculate the actual cost of serving premium customers with AI features
- Anomaly detection: Spot unusual spending patterns before they become budget disasters
Setting Up Your HolySheep AI Environment
Before implementing cost attribution, you need a proper development environment. Follow these steps to get started with HolySheep's unified API gateway.
Step 1: Create Your HolySheep Account
Visit HolySheep AI registration and create your account. New users receive free credits on signup, allowing you to test the platform before committing. The registration process takes less than two minutes.
Step 2: Generate Your API Key
Once logged in, navigate to the Dashboard and generate an API key. Store this securely—you'll use it for all API calls. The key follows the format hs_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Step 3: Install the SDK
# Install the HolySheep Python SDK
pip install holysheep-ai
Or using npm for JavaScript/TypeScript
npm install holysheep-ai
Your First AI API Call: A Complete Walkthrough
Let me walk you through your first API call step-by-step. I'll assume you have zero prior experience with API integration.
Understanding the Request Structure
An AI API request consists of three main components:
- Endpoint: The URL where you send your request
- Headers: Authentication and content-type information
- Body: Your actual request, including the model, messages, and parameters
Here is a complete, runnable Python example that makes a simple chat completion request:
import requests
import json
HolySheep AI Configuration
IMPORTANT: Replace with your actual API key from https://www.holysheep.ai/register
HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY = "YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY"
BASE_URL = "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1"
def chat_completion(model: str, messages: list, max_tokens: int = 1000):
"""
Make a chat completion request to HolySheep AI.
Args:
model: The model to use (e.g., 'deepseek-v4', 'gpt-4.1')
messages: List of message dictionaries with 'role' and 'content'
max_tokens: Maximum tokens in the response
Returns:
dict: The API response
"""
endpoint = f"{BASE_URL}/chat/completions"
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
payload = {
"model": model,
"messages": messages,
"max_tokens": max_tokens,
"temperature": 0.7
}
try:
response = requests.post(endpoint, headers=headers, json=payload)
response.raise_for_status()
return response.json()
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
print(f"Error making request: {e}")
return None
Example usage: Simple Q&A
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
{"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?"}
]
result = chat_completion("deepseek-v4", messages)
if result:
print("Response:", result['choices'][0]['message']['content'])
print(f"Tokens used: {result.get('usage', {}).get('total_tokens', 'N/A')}")
print(f"Cost: ${result.get('usage', {}).get('total_tokens', 0) * 0.000001:.6f}")
Understanding the Response
A successful response looks like this:
{
"id": "chatcmpl-abc123",
"object": "chat.completion",
"created": 1746200000,
"model": "deepseek-v4",
"choices": [
{
"index": 0,
"message": {
"role": "assistant",
"content": "The capital of France is Paris."
},
"finish_reason": "stop"
}
],
"usage": {
"prompt_tokens": 25,
"completion_tokens": 8,
"total_tokens": 33
}
}
The usage field is crucial for cost attribution. Every request returns token counts, which directly translate to costs based on the pricing table above.
Building a Cost Attribution System
Now let's build a proper cost attribution system that tracks spending by team, project, and feature. This is where things get powerful.
import requests
from datetime import datetime
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from collections import defaultdict
@dataclass
class CostRecord:
"""Represents a single API call's cost data."""
timestamp: datetime
team: str
project: str
feature: str
model: str
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
cost_usd: float
request_id: str
class CostAttributor:
"""
Enterprise cost attribution system for AI API usage.
Tracks spending by team, project, and feature dimensions.
"""
# Pricing per million tokens (USD)
PRICING = {
"deepseek-v4": {"input": 0.50, "output": 2.00},
"deepseek-v3.2": {"input": 0.42, "output": 1.68},
"gpt-4.1": {"input": 8.00, "output": 24.00},
"gemini-2.5-flash": {"input": 2.50, "output": 10.00},
}
def __init__(self, api_key: str):
self.api_key = api_key
self.base_url = "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1"
self.records: List[CostRecord] = []
def calculate_cost(self, model: str, input_tokens: int, output_tokens: int) -> float:
"""Calculate the cost of a request in USD."""
pricing = self.PRICING.get(model, {"input": 1.0, "output": 4.0})
input_cost = (input_tokens / 1_000_000) * pricing["input"]
output_cost = (output_tokens / 1_000_000) * pricing["output"]
return input_cost + output_cost
def make_attributed_request(
self,
team: str,
project: str,
feature: str,
model: str,
messages: List[Dict],
max_tokens: int = 1000
) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""
Make an API request with full cost attribution tracking.
Args:
team: Department or team name (e.g., 'marketing', 'engineering')
project: Project name (e.g., 'chatbot-v2', 'content-pipeline')
feature: Feature name (e.g., 'auto-reply', 'summarization')
model: Model identifier
messages: Chat messages
max_tokens: Maximum response tokens
Returns:
API response or None on error
"""
headers = {
"Authorization": f"Bearer {self.api_key}",
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"X-Team": team,
"X-Project": project,
"X-Feature": feature
}
payload = {
"model": model,
"messages": messages,
"max_tokens": max_tokens
}
try:
response = requests.post(
f"{self.base_url}/chat/completions",
headers=headers,
json=payload
)
response.raise_for_status()
result = response.json()
# Extract usage data
usage = result.get("usage", {})
input_tokens = usage.get("prompt_tokens", 0)
output_tokens = usage.get("completion_tokens", 0)
cost = self.calculate_cost(model, input_tokens, output_tokens)
# Record this transaction
record = CostRecord(
timestamp=datetime.now(),
team=team,
project=project,
feature=feature,
model=model,
input_tokens=input_tokens,
output_tokens=output_tokens,
cost_usd=cost,
request_id=result.get("id", "unknown")
)
self.records.append(record)
return result
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
print(f"Request failed: {e}")
return None
def get_team_costs(self, start_date: datetime = None, end_date: datetime = None) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""Get total costs grouped by team."""
costs = defaultdict(float)
for record in self.records:
if start_date and record.timestamp < start_date:
continue
if end_date and record.timestamp > end_date:
continue
costs[record.team] += record.cost_usd
return dict(costs)
def get_project_breakdown(self, team: str = None) -> Dict[str, Dict]:
"""Get detailed breakdown by project, optionally filtered by team."""
breakdown = defaultdict(lambda: {"cost": 0, "requests": 0, "tokens": 0})
for record in self.records:
if team and record.team != team:
continue
breakdown[record.project]["cost"] += record.cost_usd
breakdown[record.project]["requests"] += 1
breakdown[record.project]["tokens"] += record.input_tokens + record.output_tokens
return dict(breakdown)
def generate_report(self) -> str:
"""Generate a comprehensive cost attribution report."""
total_cost = sum(r.cost_usd for r in self.records)
report = []
report.append("=" * 60)
report.append("AI API COST ATTRIBUTION REPORT")
report.append(f"Generated: {datetime.now().isoformat()}")
report.append("=" * 60)
report.append(f"\nTotal Cost: ${total_cost:.2f}")
report.append(f"Total Requests: {len(self.records)}")
report.append("\n\nCOSTS BY TEAM:")
report.append("-" * 40)
for team, cost in sorted(self.get_team_costs().items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]):
report.append(f" {team}: ${cost:.2f} ({100*cost/total_cost:.1f}%)")
report.append("\n\nPROJECT BREAKDOWN:")
report.append("-" * 40)
for project, data in sorted(self.get_project_breakdown().items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]["cost"]):
report.append(f" {project}: ${data['cost']:.2f} ({data['requests']} requests, {data['tokens']:,} tokens)")
return "\n".join(report)
Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Initialize with your API key
attrib = CostAttributor("YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY")
# Simulate requests from different teams
test_scenarios = [
{"team": "support", "project": "chatbot-v3", "feature": "auto-reply", "model": "deepseek-v3.2"},
{"team": "marketing", "project": "content-pipeline", "feature": "blog-writer", "model": "deepseek-v4"},
{"team": "engineering", "project": "code-review", "feature": "pr-analysis", "model": "deepseek-v4"},
]
for scenario in test_scenarios:
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello, how can you help me?"}]
result = attrib.make_attributed_request(
**scenario,
messages=messages
)
if result:
print(f"✓ {scenario['team']}/{scenario['feature']}: Success")
# Print the cost report
print("\n" + attrib.generate_report())
Budget Control: Preventing Cost Overruns
Cost attribution tells you where money goes; budget control prevents overspending. Here's a production-ready budget enforcement system:
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from typing import Callable, Optional
import threading
class BudgetController:
"""
Enforce spending limits across teams, projects, or features.
Real-time tracking with automatic circuit breakers.
"""
def __init__(self):
self.budgets: Dict[str, Dict] = {}
self.spending: Dict[str, float] = defaultdict(float)
self.reset_dates: Dict[str, datetime] = {}
self.locks: Dict[str, threading.Lock] = defaultdict(threading.Lock)
def set_budget(
self,
dimension: str,
monthly_limit_usd: float,
alert_threshold: float = 0.8,
reset_period: str = "monthly"
):
"""
Set a budget limit for a spending dimension.
Args:
dimension: e.g., 'team:marketing', 'project:chatbot', 'feature:auto-reply'
monthly_limit_usd: Maximum monthly spend in USD
alert_threshold: Percentage (0-1) when alerts should fire
reset_period: 'monthly' or 'weekly'
"""
self.budgets[dimension] = {
"limit": monthly_limit_usd,
"alert_threshold": alert_threshold,
"reset_period": reset_period
}
self.spending[dimension] = 0.0
self._set_reset_date(dimension, reset_period)
def _set_reset_date(self, dimension: str, reset_period: str):
"""Set the next reset date based on the period."""
now = datetime.now()
if reset_period == "monthly":
# Reset on the 1st of next month
if now.month == 12:
self.reset_dates[dimension] = datetime(now.year + 1, 1, 1)
else:
self.reset_dates[dimension] = datetime(now.year, now.month + 1, 1)
elif reset_period == "weekly":
self.reset_dates[dimension] = now + timedelta(weeks=1)
def check_budget(self, dimension: str, additional_cost: float = 0) -> tuple[bool, str]:
"""
Check if a request would exceed budget.
Returns:
(allowed: bool, message: str)
"""
if dimension not in self.budgets:
return True, "No budget set"
budget_info = self.budgets[dimension]
current_spend = self.spending[dimension]
# Check for reset
if datetime.now() >= self.reset_dates.get(dimension, datetime.max):
current_spend = 0
self.spending[dimension] = 0
self._set_reset_date(dimension, budget_info["reset_period"])
projected_total = current_spend + additional_cost
limit = budget_info["limit"]
alert_threshold = budget_info["alert_threshold"]
if projected_total > limit:
return False, f"Budget exceeded: ${projected_total:.2f} > ${limit:.2f} limit"
if projected_total > limit * alert_threshold:
return True, f"⚠️ Alert: {100*projected_total/limit:.1f}% of budget used"
return True, "OK"
def record_spend(self, dimension: str, amount: float):
"""Record a new spend against a budget dimension."""
with self.locks[dimension]:
self.spending[dimension] += amount
def get_budget_status(self, dimension: str) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Get current budget status for a dimension."""
if dimension not in self.budgets:
return None
budget_info = self.budgets[dimension]
current = self.spending[dimension]
limit = budget_info["limit"]
return {
"dimension": dimension,
"current_spend": current,
"limit": limit,
"remaining": limit - current,
"utilization_pct": 100 * current / limit,
"resets_at": self.reset_dates.get(dimension),
"status": "OK" if current < limit * 0.8 else "WARNING" if current < limit else "EXCEEDED"
}
def get_all_status(self) -> Dict[str, Dict]:
"""Get status for all budgets."""
return {dim: self.get_budget_status(dim) for dim in self.budgets.keys()}
class BudgetEnforcedClient:
"""
Wrapper that adds automatic budget enforcement to API calls.
"""
def __init__(self, api_key: str, budget_controller: BudgetController):
self.attributor = CostAttributor(api_key)
self.budget = budget_controller
def make_request(
self,
team: str,
project: str,
feature: str,
model: str,
messages: list,
max_tokens: int = 1000,
strict_budget: bool = True
):
"""
Make a request with automatic budget checking.
Args:
strict_budget: If True, blocks requests that exceed budgets.
If False, logs warnings but allows the request.
"""
# Define budget dimensions
dimensions = [
f"team:{team}",
f"project:{project}",
f"feature:{feature}"
]
# Check budgets
for dim in dimensions:
allowed, msg = self.budget.check_budget(dim)
if not allowed and strict_budget:
raise BudgetExceededError(f"Request blocked: {msg}")
elif not allowed:
print(f"Warning: {msg}")
# Make the request
result = self.attributor.make_attributed_request(
team=team,
project=project,
feature=feature,
model=model,
messages=messages,
max_tokens=max_tokens
)
# Record spend
if result:
usage = result.get("usage", {})
input_tokens = usage.get("prompt_tokens", 0)
output_tokens = usage.get("completion_tokens", 0)
cost = self.attributor.calculate_cost(model, input_tokens, output_tokens)
for dim in dimensions:
self.budget.record_spend(dim, cost)
return result
class BudgetExceededError(Exception):
"""Raised when a request would exceed the configured budget."""
pass
Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Initialize
budget_ctrl = BudgetController()
# Set budgets (monthly limits)
budget_ctrl.set_budget("team:marketing", monthly_limit_usd=500.00)
budget_ctrl.set_budget("team:support", monthly_limit_usd=1000.00)
budget_ctrl.set_budget("project:chatbot", monthly_limit_usd=800.00)
budget_ctrl.set_budget("feature:auto-reply", monthly_limit_usd=300.00)
# Create budget-enforced client
client = BudgetEnforcedClient("YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY", budget_ctrl)
# Print initial budget status
print("Initial Budget Status:")
for dimension, status in budget_ctrl.get_all_status().items():
print(f" {dimension}: ${status['current_spend']:.2f} / ${status['limit']:.2f}")
# Try making requests
test_messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Test message"}]
try:
# This should succeed (under budget)
result = client.make_request(
team="marketing",
project="chatbot",
feature="auto-reply",
model="deepseek-v3.2",
messages=test_messages
)
print("\n✓ Request succeeded")
except BudgetExceededError as e:
print(f"\n✗ Request blocked: {e}")
Model Routing: Sending the Right Task to the Right Model
Model routing is the strategic decision of which AI model handles which request. The goal: maximize quality while minimizing cost. Here's a production routing system:
from enum import Enum
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
import hashlib
class TaskComplexity(Enum):
"""Classification of task complexity levels."""
TRIVIAL = 1 # Simple Q&A, basic formatting
STANDARD = 2 # Standard content generation, summarization
COMPLEX = 3 # Multi-step reasoning, code generation
EXPERT = 4 # Advanced reasoning, complex analysis
class TaskType(Enum):
"""Categories of AI tasks."""
QUESTION_ANSWER = "question_answer"
SUMMARIZATION = "summarization"
CONTENT_GENERATION = "content_generation"
CODE_GENERATION = "code_generation"
CODE_REVIEW = "code_review"
DATA_ANALYSIS = "data_analysis"
CREATIVE_WRITING = "creative_writing"
REASONING = "reasoning"
TRANSLATION = "translation"
class ModelRouter:
"""
Intelligent model routing based on task characteristics.
Routes requests to the most cost-effective model that meets quality requirements.
"""
# Model capabilities matrix
MODEL_CAPABILITIES = {
"deepseek-v3.2": {
"complexity_cap": TaskComplexity.STANDARD,
"task_types": [
TaskType.QUESTION_ANSWER,
TaskType.SUMMARIZATION,
TaskType.TRANSLATION,
],
"context_window": 128000,
"strengths": ["Speed", "Cost efficiency", "Simple tasks"],
"weaknesses": ["Complex reasoning", "Long context"]
},
"deepseek-v4": {
"complexity_cap": TaskComplexity.EXPERT,
"task_types": [
TaskType.QUESTION_ANSWER,
TaskType.SUMMARIZATION,
TaskType.CONTENT_GENERATION,
TaskType.CODE_GENERATION,
TaskType.CODE_REVIEW,
TaskType.DATA_ANALYSIS,
TaskType.REASONING,
TaskType.TRANSLATION,
],
"context_window": 200000,
"strengths": ["Advanced reasoning", "Code", "Multilingual"],
"weaknesses": ["Slightly higher cost than v3.2"]
},
"gpt-4.1": {
"complexity_cap": TaskComplexity.EXPERT,
"task_types": [
TaskType.QUESTION_ANSWER,
TaskType.CONTENT_GENERATION,
TaskType.CODE_GENERATION,
TaskType.CODE_REVIEW,
TaskType.DATA_ANALYSIS,
TaskType.CREATIVE_WRITING,
TaskType.REASONING,
],
"context_window": 128000,
"strengths": ["Premium quality", "Complex reasoning"],
"weaknesses": ["Higher cost", "Slower"]
},
"gemini-2.5-flash": {
"complexity_cap": TaskComplexity.COMPLEX,
"task_types": [
TaskType.QUESTION_ANSWER,
TaskType.SUMMARIZATION,
TaskType.CONTENT_GENERATION,
TaskType.TRANSLATION,
],
"context_window": 1000000,
"strengths": ["Long context", "Speed", "Multimodal"],
"weaknesses": ["Output quality for complex tasks"]
}
}
# Fallback routing: what to use if primary model fails
FALLBACK_CHAIN = {
"deepseek-v4": ["deepseek-v3.2", "gemini-2.5-flash"],
"deepseek-v3.2": ["gemini-2.5-flash"],
"gpt-4.1": ["deepseek-v4", "gemini-2.5-flash"]
}
def classify_task(self, messages: List[Dict], task_type_hint: str = None) -> tuple[TaskType, TaskComplexity]:
"""
Classify a request to determine appropriate routing.
This is a simplified heuristic. In production, you'd use
ML classification or LLM-based task analysis.
"""
# If user provides a hint, use it
if task_type_hint:
try:
task_type = TaskType(task_type_hint)
except ValueError:
task_type = TaskType.QUESTION_ANSWER
else:
# Heuristic classification based on content
last_message = messages[-1]["content"].lower()
if any(kw in last_message for kw in ["code", "function", "class", "def ", "import"]):
task_type = TaskType.CODE_GENERATION
elif any(kw in last_message for kw in ["review", "analyze", "check"]):
task_type = TaskType.CODE_REVIEW
elif any(kw in last_message for kw in ["summarize", "tl;dr", "brief"]):
task_type = TaskType.SUMMARIZATION
elif any(kw in last_message for kw in ["translate", "translation"]):
task_type = TaskType.TRANSLATION
elif any(kw in last_message for kw in ["story", "poem", "creative"]):
task_type = TaskType.CREATIVE_WRITING
elif any(kw in last_message for kw in ["explain", "why", "how", "what is"]):
task_type = TaskType.QUESTION_ANSWER
else:
task_type = TaskType.CONTENT_GENERATION
# Complexity estimation (simplified)
# In production, use token count, presence of multiple questions, etc.
last_message = messages[-1]["content"]
token_estimate = len(last_message.split()) * 1.3 # Rough estimate
if token_estimate < 50 and len(messages) <= 2:
complexity = TaskComplexity.TRIVIAL
elif token_estimate < 200 and len(messages) <= 4:
complexity = TaskComplexity.STANDARD
elif token_estimate < 1000 or len(messages) > 6:
complexity = TaskComplexity.COMPLEX
else:
complexity = TaskComplexity.EXPERT
return task_type, complexity
def route(
self,
messages: List[Dict],
task_type_hint: str = None,
prefer_quality: bool = False,
prefer_cost: bool = False
) -> str:
"""
Determine the optimal model for a request.
Args:
messages: Chat messages
task_type_hint: Optional hint about task type
prefer_quality: If True, prioritize quality over cost
prefer_cost: If True, prioritize cost over quality
Returns:
Model name to use
"""
task_type, complexity = self.classify_task(messages, task_type_hint)
# Find eligible models
eligible = []
for model, capabilities in self.MODEL_CAPABILITIES.items():
if task_type in capabilities["task_types"]:
if complexity.value <= capabilities["complexity_cap"].value:
eligible.append(model)
if not eligible:
# Default to most capable model
return "deepseek-v4"
# Ranking logic
if prefer_quality:
# Sort by capability (reverse order)
eligible.sort(key=lambda m: self.MODEL_CAPABILITIES[m]["complexity_cap"].value, reverse=True)
elif prefer_cost:
# Sort by cost (forward order)
cost_map = {"deepseek-v3.2": 1, "gemini-2.5-flash": 2, "deepseek-v4": 3, "gpt-4.1": 4}
eligible.sort(key=lambda m: cost_map.get(m, 99))
else:
# Balance: use cheapest that meets requirements
cost_map = {"deepseek-v3.2": 1, "gemini-2.5-flash": 2, "deepseek-v4": 3, "gpt-4.1": 4}
eligible.sort(key=lambda m: cost_map.get(m, 99))
return eligible[0]
def get_routing_explanation(self, messages: List[Dict], task_type_hint: str = None) -> Dict:
"""Get detailed explanation of routing decision."""
task_type, complexity = self.classify_task(messages, task_type_hint)
recommended_model = self.route(messages, task_type_hint)
return {
"classified_task": task_type.value,
"estimated_complexity": complexity.name,
"recommended_model": recommended_model,
"alternatives": [
{
"model": model,
"capabilities": self.MODEL_CAPABILITIES[model]["strengths"]
}
for model in ["deepseek-v4", "gpt-4.1"]
if model != recommended_model
],
"fallback_chain": self.FALLBACK_CHAIN.get(recommended_model, [])
}
Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
router = ModelRouter()
test_cases = [
{
"name": "Simple Question",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of Japan?"}]
},
{
"name": "Code Generation",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Write a Python function to calculate fibonacci numbers recursively"}]
},
{
"name": "Complex Analysis",
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": "Analyze this code for security vulnerabilities: " + "x = input()" * 100}
]
}
]
print("MODEL ROUTING DECISIONS")
print("=" * 60)
for case in test_cases:
explanation = router.get_routing_explanation(case["messages"])
print(f"\n{case['name']}:")
print(f" Task Type: {explanation['classified_task']}")
print(f" Complexity: {explanation['estimated_complexity']}")
print(f" Recommended: {explanation['recommended_model']}")
Complete Production Integration
Here's how all the pieces fit together in a production system:
from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException, Request
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import List, Optional
import uvicorn
app = FastAPI(title="HolySheep AI Gateway", version="1.0.0")
Initialize components
cost_attributor = CostAttributor("YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY")
budget_controller = BudgetController()
router = ModelRouter()
Set up budgets
budget_controller.set_budget("team:marketing", 500.00)
budget_controller.set_budget("team:support", 1000.00)
budget_controller.set_budget("team:engineering", 2000.00)
class ChatRequest(BaseModel):
team: str
project: str
feature: str
messages: List[dict]
model: Optional[str] = None
max_tokens: Optional[int] = 1000
task_type_hint: Optional[str] = None
auto_route: bool = True
class ChatResponse(BaseModel