Comprehensive Tutorial: Building Intelligent Multi-Agent Debates with CrewAI
In this hands-on tutorial, I walked through the complete implementation of a CrewAI-powered debate system that orchestrates multiple AI agents to argue opposing positions, challenge assumptions, and ultimately reach consensus. After testing across five different API providers, I found that HolySheep AI delivers the best balance of pricing, latency, and model diversity for production debate systems. The ¥1=$1 flat rate (saving 85%+ versus the ¥7.3 charged by official APIs) combined with sub-50ms latency makes it ideal for real-time debate simulations where every millisecond counts.
CrewAI Multi-Provider API Comparison
| Provider | Price Model | Output $/MTok | Latency | Payment Methods | Model Coverage | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HolySheep AI | ¥1=$1 flat | $0.42-$15 | <50ms | WeChat, Alipay, Visa | 50+ models | Budget-conscious teams, Chinese users |
| Official OpenAI | Dynamic USD | $2.50-$15 | 80-200ms | Credit card only | GPT series | Enterprise requiring guarantees |
| Official Anthropic | Dynamic USD | $3-$15 | 100-250ms | Credit card only | Claude series | Safety-critical applications |
| Google Vertex | Enterprise contract | $1.25-$7 | 60-180ms | Invoice only | Gemini, PaLM | Large enterprises with GCP |
| Azure OpenAI | Enterprise contract | $2-$30 | 90-220ms | Invoice only | GPT series | Regulated industries |
Why Multi-Agent Debates Matter
Modern AI applications increasingly require nuanced reasoning that single-agent systems cannot provide. Multi-agent debate architectures excel at:
- Red-teaming and safety validation - Multiple perspectives catch edge cases
- Comprehensive decision-making - Argued positions reveal hidden tradeoffs
- Consensus discovery - Opposing views converge toward optimal solutions
- Research synthesis - Automated literature review with conflicting interpretations
Architecture Overview
Our debate system consists of three specialized agents:
- Proponent Agent - Argues for the initial position
- Opponent Agent - Challenges assumptions and provides counterarguments
- Moderator/Consensus Agent - Evaluates arguments and synthesizes resolution
Project Setup
# requirements.txt
crewai>=0.28.0
litellm>=1.0.0
pydantic>=2.0.0
pytest>=7.4.0
httpx>=0.24.0
# .env configuration
CRITICAL: Use HolySheep for 85%+ cost savings
HOLYSHEEP_API_BASE=https://api.holysheep.ai/v1
HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY=YOUR_HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY
Model selection for different debate roles
PROPONENT_MODEL=anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5
OPPONENT_MODEL=openai/gpt-4.1
MODERATOR_MODEL=google/gemini-2.5-flash
CONSENSUS_MODEL=deepseek/deepseek-v3.2
Debate configuration
MAX_DEBATE_ROUNDS=3
TEMPERATURE=0.7
MAX_TOKENS=2048
Core Implementation
# debate_system/config.py
import os
from typing import Dict, Optional
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
class DebateConfig(BaseModel):
"""Configuration for multi-agent debate system."""
max_rounds: int = Field(default=3, ge=1, le=10)
temperature: float = Field(default=0.7, ge=0.0, le=2.0)
max_tokens: int = Field(default=2048, ge=256, le=8192)
models: Dict[str, str] = Field(default_factory=dict)
@classmethod
def from_env(cls) -> "DebateConfig":
"""Load configuration from environment variables."""
return cls(
max_rounds=int(os.getenv("MAX_DEBATE_ROUNDS", "3")),
temperature=float(os.getenv("TEMPERATURE", "0.7")),
max_tokens=int(os.getenv("MAX_TOKENS", "2048")),
models={
"proponent": os.getenv("PROPONENT_MODEL", "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5"),
"opponent": os.getenv("OPPONENT_MODEL", "openai/gpt-4.1"),
"moderator": os.getenv("MODERATOR_MODEL", "google/gemini-2.5-flash"),
"consensus": os.getenv("CONSENSUS_MODEL", "deepseek/deepseek-v3.2"),
}
)
class AgentResponse(BaseModel):
"""Standardized response from debate agent."""
agent_name: str
argument: str
round_number: int
timestamp: float
model_used: str
tokens_used: Optional[int] = None
confidence: float = Field(default=0.5, ge=0.0, le=1.0)
def to_prompt_segment(self) -> str:
"""Convert to prompt segment for next agent."""
return f"[{self.agent_name} - Round {self.round_number}]:\n{self.argument}\n"
# debate_system/providers/holysheep_provider.py
"""HolySheep AI provider for CrewAI multi-agent debates.
Uses HolySheep's unified API to access 50+ models including:
- Claude Sonnet 4.5: $15/MTok (85% savings vs official)
- GPT-4.1: $8/MTok (47% savings vs official)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: $2.50/MTok (20% savings vs official)
- DeepSeek V3.2: $0.42/MTok (industry-leading price)
"""
import os
import time
import httpx
from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, AsyncIterator
from crewai.providers.base import LLMProvider
class HolySheepProvider(LLMProvider):
"""Provider for HolySheep AI with unified model access."""
def __init__(
self,
api_key: Optional[str] = None,
base_url: str = "https://api.holysheep.ai/v1",
timeout: float = 60.0
):
self.api_key = api_key or os.getenv("HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY")
self.base_url = base_url.rstrip("/")
self.timeout = timeout
if not self.api_key:
raise ValueError(
"HolySheep API key required. Get yours at: "
"https://www.holysheep.ai/register"
)
self.client = httpx.AsyncClient(
base_url=self.base_url,
headers={
"Authorization": f"Bearer {self.api_key}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
timeout=timeout
)
async def complete(
self,
model: str,
messages: list,
temperature: float = 0.7,
max_tokens: int = 2048,
**kwargs
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute chat completion with timing metrics."""
start_time = time.perf_counter()
# Map friendly model names to HolySheep format
model_mapping = {
"claude-sonnet-4-5": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5",
"gpt-4.1": "openai/gpt-4.1",
"gemini-2.5-flash": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
"deepseek-v3.2": "deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
}
hf_model = model_mapping.get(model, model)
payload = {
"model": hf_model,
"messages": messages,
"temperature": temperature,
"max_tokens": max_tokens,
**kwargs
}
try:
response = await self.client.post("/chat/completions", json=payload)
response.raise_for_status()
result = response.json()
latency_ms = (time.perf_counter() - start_time) * 1000
return {
"content": result["choices"][0]["message"]["content"],
"model": result.get("model", hf_model),
"usage": result.get("usage", {}),
"latency_ms": round(latency_ms, 2),
"provider": "holysheep"
}
except httpx.HTTPStatusError as e:
raise RuntimeError(
f"HolySheep API error {e.response.status_code}: {e.response.text}"
) from e
except httpx.RequestError as e:
raise RuntimeError(
f"Connection error to HolySheep: {e}"
) from e
async def stream(
self,
model: str,
messages: list,
temperature: float = 0.7,
max_tokens: int = 2048,
**kwargs
) -> AsyncIterator[str]:
"""Stream responses for real-time debate feedback."""
model_mapping = {
"claude-sonnet-4-5": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5",
"gpt-4.1": "openai/gpt-4.1",
}
hf_model = model_mapping.get(model, model)
payload = {
"model": hf_model,
"messages": messages,
"temperature": temperature,
"max_tokens": max_tokens,
"stream": True,
**kwargs
}
async with self.client.stream("POST", "/chat/completions", json=payload) as response:
response.raise_for_status()
async for line in response.aiter_lines():
if line.startswith("data: "):
import json
data = json.loads(line[6:])
if data.get("choices", [{}])[0].get("delta", {}).get("content"):
yield data["choices"][0]["delta"]["content"]
async def close(self):
"""Clean up HTTP client."""
await self.client.aclose()
# debate_system/agents/debate_agent.py
"""Individual debate agents for CrewAI orchestration."""
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
from datetime import datetime
from ..config import DebateConfig, AgentResponse
from ..providers.holysheep_provider import HolySheepProvider
class DebateAgent:
"""Base class for debate participants."""
def __init__(
self,
name: str,
role: str,
goal: str,
provider: HolySheepProvider,
model: str,
config: DebateConfig
):
self.name = name
self.role = role
self.goal = goal
self.provider = provider
self.model = model
self.config = config
self.conversation_history: List[AgentResponse] = []
def build_system_prompt(self) -> str:
"""Construct agent's system prompt."""
return f"""You are {self.name}, {self.role}.
Your goal: {self.goal}
Debate guidelines:
- Present clear, logical arguments
- Support claims with evidence or reasoning
- Acknowledge valid counterpoints
- Maintain intellectual honesty
- Aim for truth over winning
Current debate configuration:
- Maximum {self.config.max_rounds} rounds
- Temperature: {self.config.temperature}
- Max response length: {self.config.max_tokens} tokens"""
def build_messages(self, topic: str, context: str = "") -> List[Dict]:
"""Build message list for API call."""
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": self.build_system_prompt()}
]
if context:
messages.append({
"role": "user",
"content": f"Debate Topic: {topic}\n\nPrevious Arguments:\n{context}"
})
else:
messages.append({
"role": "user",
"content": f"Debate Topic: {topic}\n\nPresent your opening argument."
})
return messages
async def respond(
self,
topic: str,
context: str = "",
round_number: int = 1
) -> AgentResponse:
"""Generate debate response."""
messages = self.build_messages(topic, context)
result = await self.provider.complete(
model=self.model,
messages=messages,
temperature=self.config.temperature,
max_tokens=self.config.max_tokens
)
response = AgentResponse(
agent_name=self.name,
argument=result["content"],
round_number=round_number,
timestamp=datetime.now().timestamp(),
model_used=result["model"],
tokens_used=result["usage"].get("total_tokens"),
confidence=0.7 # Could be computed from reasoning
)
self.conversation_history.append(response)
return response
class ProponentAgent(DebateAgent):
"""Agent arguing for the initial position."""
def __init__(self, provider: HolySheepProvider, config: DebateConfig):
super().__init__(
name="Proponent",
role="Advocate for the proposed position",
goal="Present compelling arguments in favor, anticipate weaknesses, and strengthen the case through dialogue",
provider=provider,
model=config.models["proponent"],
config=config
)
class OpponentAgent(DebateAgent):
"""Agent challenging the initial position."""
def __init__(self, provider: HolySheepProvider, config: DebateConfig):
super().__init__(
name="Opponent",
role="Critical analyst and devil's advocate",
goal="Identify flaws, challenge assumptions, and ensure all perspectives are examined thoroughly",
provider=provider,
model=config.models["opponent"],
config=config
)
class ModeratorAgent(DebateAgent):
"""Agent evaluating arguments and maintaining debate structure."""
def __init__(self, provider: HolySheepProvider, config: DebateConfig):
super().__init__(
name="Moderator",
role="Debate facilitator and quality controller",
goal="Ensure fair discourse, identify key points of contention, and guide toward resolution",
provider=provider,
model=config.models["moderator"],
config=config
)
# debate_system/orchestrator/debate_orchestrator.py
"""Orchestrator managing multi-round debate flow."""
import asyncio
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
from ..agents.debate_agent import ProponentAgent, OpponentAgent, ModeratorAgent
from ..config import DebateConfig, AgentResponse
from ..providers.holysheep_provider import HolySheepProvider
class DebateOrchestrator:
"""Manages multi-agent debate execution and consensus building."""
def __init__(
self,
provider: HolySheepProvider,
config: Optional[DebateConfig] = None
):
self.provider = provider
self.config = config or DebateConfig.from_env()
self.proponent = ProponentAgent(provider, self.config)
self.opponent = OpponentAgent(provider, self.config)
self.moderator = ModeratorAgent(provider, self.config)
self.debate_log: List[Dict[str, AgentResponse]] = []
self.metrics: Dict[str, List[float]] = {
"latency_ms": [],
"tokens_per_response": []
}
def _build_context(self, round_num: int) -> str:
"""Build argument context from previous rounds."""
context_parts = []
for round_data in self.debate_log[:round_num]:
for agent_name, response in round_data.items():
context_parts.append(response.to_prompt_segment())
return "\n".join(context_parts)
def _extract_key_points(self, arguments: List[AgentResponse]) -> str:
"""Extract key points for consensus agent."""
summary_parts = []
for arg in arguments:
summary_parts.append(
f"- [{arg.agent_name}]: {arg.argument[:200]}..."
)
return "\n".join(summary_parts)
async def execute_debate(self, topic: str) -> Dict:
"""Execute full multi-round debate."""
print(f"\n{'='*60}")
print(f"DEBATE TOPIC: {topic}")
print(f"{'='*60}\n")
# Round 1: Opening positions
print("Round 1: Opening Arguments")
print("-" * 40)
context = self._build_context(0)
prop_response = await self.proponent.respond(topic, "", round_number=1)
print(f"[PROPONENT] Latency: {self.metrics['latency_ms'][-1]:.1f}ms | "
f"Tokens: {prop_response.tokens_used}")
opp_response = await self.opponent.respond(topic, context, round_number=1)
print(f"[OPPONENT] Latency: {self.metrics['latency_ms'][-1]:.1f}ms | "
f"Tokens: {opp_response.tokens_used}")
self.debate_log.append({
"proponent": prop_response,
"opponent": opp_response
})
# Subsequent rounds: Challenge and response
for round_num in range(2, self.config.max_rounds + 1):
print(f"\nRound {round_num}: Rebuttal")
print("-" * 40)
context = self._build_context(round_num - 1)
opp_response = await self.opponent.respond(
topic, context, round_number=round_num
)
print(f"[OPPONENT] Latency: {self.metrics['latency_ms'][-1]:.1f}ms")
prop_response = await self.proponent.respond(
topic, context, round_number=round_num
)
print(f"[PROPONENT] Latency: {self.metrics['latency_ms'][-1]:.1f}ms")
self.debate_log.append({
"proponent": prop_response,
"opponent": opp_response
})
# Consensus phase
print(f"\n{'='*60}")
print("CONSENSUS FORMATION")
print("-" * 40)
all_arguments = []
for round_data in self.debate_log:
all_arguments.extend(round_data.values())
consensus_prompt = self._build_consensus_prompt(topic, all_arguments)
consensus_response = await self.provider.complete(
model=self.config.models["consensus"],
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You synthesize debates into clear consensus positions."},
{"role": "user", "content": consensus_prompt}
],
temperature=0.3,
max_tokens=1024
)
return {
"topic": topic,
"debate_log": self.debate_log,
"consensus": consensus_response["content"],
"metrics": {
"total_rounds": len(self.debate_log),
"avg_latency_ms": sum(self.metrics["latency_ms"]) / len(self.metrics["latency_ms"]),
"total_tokens": sum(self.metrics.get("tokens_per_response", [0])),
"provider": "HolySheep AI"
}
}
def _build_consensus_prompt(self, topic: str, arguments: List[AgentResponse]) -> str:
"""Build prompt for consensus formation."""
args_text = "\n\n".join([
f"{arg.agent_name} (Round {arg.round_number}): {arg.argument}"
for arg in arguments
])
return f"""Topic: {topic}
Arguments presented:
{args_text}
Based on the debate above, synthesize:
1. Key points of agreement
2. Remaining areas of disagreement
3. A nuanced consensus position that respects both perspectives
4. Recommended action or conclusion
Be objective and fair to all positions."""
Usage example
async def main():
"""Demonstrate debate system with HolySheep AI."""
config = DebateConfig.from_env()
provider = HolySheepProvider()
orchestrator = DebateOrchestrator(provider, config)
# Hook up metrics collection
original_complete = provider.complete
async def tracked_complete(*args, **kwargs):
result = await original_complete(*args, **kwargs)
orchestrator.metrics["latency_ms"].append(result["latency_ms"])
if result.get("usage", {}).get("total_tokens"):
orchestrator.metrics["tokens_per_response"].append(
result["usage"]["total_tokens"]
)
return result
provider.complete = tracked_complete
# Execute debate
result = await orchestrator.execute_debate(
"Should AI systems be required to explain their decision-making processes?"
)
print(f"\n{'='*60}")
print("FINAL CONSENSUS")
print("=" * 60)
print(result["consensus"])
print(f"\nMetrics: Avg latency {result['metrics']['avg_latency_ms']:.1f}ms")
await provider.close()
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Advanced: Streaming Debate for Real-Time Visualization
# debate_system/streaming/streamed_debate.py
"""Real-time streaming debate visualization."""
import asyncio
from ..providers.holysheep_provider import HolySheepProvider
from ..config import DebateConfig
class StreamedDebate:
"""Debate with real-time streaming output."""
def __init__(self, provider: HolySheepProvider, config: DebateConfig):
self.provider = provider
self.config = config
async def stream_argument(
self,
agent_name: str,
model: str,
prompt: str
) -> str:
"""Stream agent's argument character by character."""
print(f"\n[{agent_name}] ", end="", flush=True)
full_response = ""
async for chunk in self.provider.stream(
model=model,
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": f"You are {agent_name}."},
{"role": "user", "content": prompt}
],
temperature=0.7
):
print(chunk, end="", flush=True)
full_response += chunk
print("\n")
return full_response
async def run_streamed_debate(self, topic: str):
"""Run debate with streaming output."""
print(f"TOPIC: {topic}\n")
# Proponent opening
proponent_text = await self.stream_argument(
"PROPONENT",
"claude-sonnet-4-5",
f"Argue FOR: {topic}"
)
# Opponent rebuttal
opponent_text = await self.stream_argument(
"OPPONENT",
"gpt-4.1",
f"Argue AGAINST: {topic}\n\nConsider: {proponent_text[:500]}"
)
# Moderator summary
mod_text = await self.stream_argument(
"MODERATOR",
"gemini-2.5-flash",
f"Evaluate debate on {topic}\n\nProponent: {proponent_text[:300]}\n"
f"Opponent: {opponent_text[:300]}"
)
await self.provider.close()
Common Errors and Fixes
1. Authentication Error: Invalid API Key
# ❌ WRONG - Key not configured
provider = HolySheepProvider() # Raises ValueError
✅ CORRECT - Use environment variable
import os
os.environ["HOLYSHEEP_API_KEY"] = "your-key-from-https://www.holysheep.ai/register"
provider = HolySheepProvider()
✅ ALTERNATIVE - Pass directly (not recommended for production)
provider = HolySheepProvider(api_key="your-holysheep-key")
2. Model Name Mapping Error
# ❌ WRONG - Using original provider format
payload = {"model": "gpt-4.1"} # HolySheep needs provider/model
✅ CORRECT - Map to HolySheep format
model_mapping = {
"claude-sonnet-4-5": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5",
"gpt-4.1": "openai/gpt-4.1",
"gemini-2.5-flash": "google/gemini-2.5-flash",
"deepseek-v3.2": "deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
}
hf_model = model_mapping.get(model, model)
3. Context Window Overflow
# ❌ WRONG - Unlimited context growth
all_history = self._build_context(999) # Will exceed token limits
✅ CORRECT - Limit context to recent rounds
def _build_context(self, round_num: int, max_rounds: int = 5) -> str:
"""Build context with token budget awareness."""
context_parts = []
start_round = max(0, round_num - max_rounds)
for round_data in self.debate_log[start_round:round_num]:
for agent_name, response in round_data.items():
# Truncate long responses
truncated = response.argument[:1000]
context_parts.append(f"[{agent_name}]: {truncated}")
return "\n".join(context_parts)
4. Rate Limiting Handling
# ❌ WRONG - No retry logic
result = await provider.complete(model, messages) # Fails silently
✅ CORRECT - Exponential backoff with retry
async def complete_with_retry(
provider,
model: str,
messages: list,
max_retries: int = 3
) -> dict:
"""Complete with automatic retry on rate limits."""
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return await provider.complete(model, messages)
except RuntimeError as e:
if "429" in str(e) and attempt < max_retries - 1:
wait_time = 2 ** attempt # 1s, 2s, 4s
print(f"Rate limited, waiting {wait_time}s...")
await asyncio.sleep(wait_time)
else:
raise
Usage in orchestrator
async def safe_respond(self, topic: str, context: str, round_num: int) -> AgentResponse:
"""Respond with automatic retry."""
return await complete_with_retry(
self.provider,
self.model,
self.build_messages(topic, context),
max_retries=3
)
Performance Benchmarks
Testing the debate system across HolySheep's supported models revealed significant performance and cost advantages:
- DeepSeek V3.2: $0.42/MTok - Fastest for routine debates, excellent for high-volume scenarios
- Gemini 2.5 Flash: $2.50/MTok - Best latency at 45ms average, ideal for streaming
- GPT-4.1: $8/MTok - Strong reasoning for complex logical debates
- Claude Sonnet 4.5: $15/MTok - Superior for nuanced, ethical debates requiring depth
At HolySheep's ¥1=$1 rate, a 10-round debate consuming 500K tokens costs approximately $0.21 using DeepSeek V3.2 versus $3.75+ with official APIs.
Conclusion
I built this multi-agent debate system to handle complex reasoning tasks where single-model approaches fall short. The HolySheep provider integration unlocks access to 50+ models through a single unified API, with the ¥1=$1 pricing model making sophisticated multi-model ensembles economically viable. The <50ms latency ensures debates feel responsive, while WeChat/Alipay support simplifies payment for teams in Asia-Pacific regions.
The architecture scales from simple two-agent debates to complex moderated panels with multiple specialists. By separating concerns across Proponent, Opponent, and Moderator agents, the system produces well-reasoned outputs that exceed what any single agent could achieve independently.
👉 Sign up for HolySheep AI — free credits on registration