I shipped a 9 M-token/month RAG pipeline in late 2025, and within two billing cycles my Claude Opus 4.7 invoice had crossed $1,200. That is when I started treating the cost-per-million-tokens column as a first-class product feature and rerouted every frontier model through the Sign up here for HolySheep AI relay. This guide distills six weeks of head-to-head testing into a no-nonsense 2026 price comparison between DeepSeek V4, DeepSeek V3.2, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-4.1, and Gemini 2.5 Flash — every figure benchmarked against the same OpenAI-compatible base URL.

2026 Output Pricing — Verified Snapshot

All list prices below were captured from each vendor's pricing page in January 2026 and re-verified via the HolySheep relay's x-holysheep-quote response header. Output tokens are the dominant cost driver for chat and agent workloads, so the table focuses there; input tokens are billed at roughly 4x–30x lower per model.

ModelVendorInput $/MTokOutput $/MTokContext Window
DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek$0.07$0.42128 K
DeepSeek V4 (preview)DeepSeek$0.12$0.68256 K
GPT-4.1OpenAI$2.50$8.001 M
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic$3.00$15.00200 K
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic$15.00$75.00500 K
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle$0.15$2.501 M

DeepSeek had not finalized GA pricing for V4 at the time of writing, so the $0.68/MTok output figure reflects the early-access tier quoted through the HolySheep relay. Treat it as directional — within 5–10% of the eventual list price, in our estimation.

10M Output Tokens / Month — Concrete Bill Comparison

Anchoring the math on a real workload removes all the hand-waving. Imagine a mid-sized SaaS generating 10 million output tokens per month — roughly 2,500 long-form completions at 4 K tokens each, or about 80,000 customer chat replies. At pure list price, ignoring input tokens: